State v. Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is axiomatic that a person who is not a member of the Bar of the State of Arizona cannot practice or represent another in any of the State’s courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eastern v. Canty
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-05-18· cited 54×
• State v. Brake
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1986-02-24· cited 11×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Duncan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
• United States v. Darby
  Supreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 1,152×
• Shapiro v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1948-10-11· cited 599×
• Davis v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1946-10-21· cited 560×
• District of Columbia v. Clawans
  Supreme Court· 1937-04-05· cited 381×
• O'NEILL v. Mangum
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1968-10-10· cited 35×
• State v. Cousins
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-12-10· cited 26×