Eastern v. Canty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the courts have a duty to examine their jurisdiction even if not raised by the parties
• explaining the courts have a duty to examine their jurisdiction even if not raised by the parties
• explaining the courts have a duty to examine their jurisdiction even if not raised by the parties
• “Had the [federal court’s] order ... remanded the case, the [state] circuit court would thereby have reacquired jurisdiction.” (Citations omitted.)
• all stating that every requirement of the federal removal statute, including the filing of the notice of removal with the clerk of the state court, must be satisfied before a district court gains exclusive jurisdiction over a matter
• all stating that every requirement of the federal removal statute, including the filing of the notice of removal with the clerk of the state court, must be satisfied before a district court gains exclusive jurisdiction over a matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).