O'NEILL v. Mangum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants charged with “drunk and disorderly” conduct were not entitled to jury trial
• holding that defendants charged with \drunk and disorderly\ conduct were not entitled to jury trial
• finding that “it can hardly be suggested that one charged or guilty of mere ‘drunk and disorderly' conduct is a depraved and inherently base person”
• maximum penalty of six months and $300 fine for drunk and disorderly conduct in 1968 insufficient for jury eligibility
• maximum penalty of six months and $300 fine for drunk and disorderly conduct in 1968 insufficient for jury eligibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).