Arizona Supreme Court· 11/3/1988
State v. Stevens
Citations
- 764 P.2d 724
- 158 Ariz. 595
- 1988 Ariz. LEXIS 180
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- findings of defendant’s diminished capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct, lack of prior convictions, and non-aggressive nature outweighed finding that the killing was done for pecuniary gain
- reducing death penalty to life imprisonment where defendant, at pre-arranged drug sale with co-worker, robbed and shot co-worker's companion
- finding of impaired capacity based on two experts’ testimony regarding defendant's impaired capacity
- finding of impaired capacity based on two experts' testimony regarding defendant's impaired capacity
- aggravating factor that murder was committed for pecuniary gain outweighed by mitigating factor of defendant's diminished capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct due to heavy alcohol and drug consumption the day of the killing
- aggravating factor that murder was committed for pecuniary gain outweighed by mitigating factor of defendant’s diminished capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct due to heavy alcohol and drug consumption the day of the killing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Gordon, Holohan, Moeller, Feldman, Ariz, Const, Lacagnina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court· 1993-08-12· cited 658×
- State v. RamirezArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-24· cited 169×
- State v. GreeneArizona Supreme Court· 1998-10-20· cited 158×
- State v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court· 1992-01-28· cited 142×
- State v. GreenwayArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-03· cited 139×
- State v. StanleyArizona Supreme Court· 1991-02-07· cited 96×
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court· 1990-06-26· cited 75×
- State v. MurdaughArizona Supreme Court· 2004-09-15· cited 58×
- State v. KilesArizona Supreme Court· 1993-04-15· cited 57×
- State v. HerreraArizona Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 56×
- State v. CookArizona Supreme Court· 1991-12-05· cited 55×
- State v. SansingArizona Supreme Court· 2003-09-24· cited 54×
- State v. Herrera, Jr.Arizona Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 40×
- State v. RossiArizona Supreme Court· 1992-04-02· cited 17×
- George Kayer v. Charles L. RyanNinth Circuit· 2019-05-13· cited 17×
- George Kayer v. Charles L. RyanNinth Circuit· 2019-12-18· cited 2×
- State of Arizona v. Jack Jude Martinez, Jr.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-03-02
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Booth v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1987-09-21· cited 1,501×
- United States v. HenrySupreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 1,013×
- State v. GretzlerArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-06· cited 374×
- Poland v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1986-05-05· cited 338×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1976-12-20· cited 250×
- Florey v. Sioux Falls School District 49-5Supreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 171×
- Johnson ex rel. Rossiello v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1980-11-10· cited 150×
- State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-10· cited 131×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1982-04-13· cited 116×
- State v. BeatyArizona Supreme Court· 1988-11-01· cited 115×
- State v. JordanArizona Supreme Court· 1980-06-19· cited 108×
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 95×
- State v. BrookoverArizona Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 87×
- State v. GrahamArizona Supreme Court· 1983-02-09· cited 80×
- State v. HensleyArizona Supreme Court· 1984-11-28· cited 69×
- In re WeigangSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 57×
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court· 1980-03-27· cited 39×
- McLaughlin v. FahringerArizona Supreme Court· 1986-07-29· cited 37×
- State v. PolandArizona Supreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 23×
- State v. BritsonArizona Supreme Court· 1981-10-14· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.