State v. Steele
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5133
Syllabus
Jury instructions; proximate result; ineffective assistance of counsel; plain error; R.C. 1.51; general v. specific statutes; allied offenses; closing argument; vouching; weight of the evidence. The trial court did not commit plain error when it failed to instruct on proximate result where the evidence was straightforward, the issue was not disputed, and the record did not reflect that the jury lost its way when it found the appellant guilty of murder under R.C. 2903.02(B). Additionally, appellant's counsel did not provide ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to request the instruction, because appellant was not prejudiced by the omission. Appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel when his counsel did not move to dismiss the felonious assault serious physical harm count under R.C. 1.51. While felonious assault serious physical harm is a general statute when compared to felonious assault deadly weapon, the statutes are not irreconcilable. Counsel, therefore, did not commit an error when he did not move to dismiss the count. The trial court did not err when it allowed the prosecution to comment on the failure of the defense to call a witness with knowledge of the crime. A party may comment on the failure of the opposing party to call a witness with knowledge. Here, the appellant generally challenged the State's key witness's credibility and the failure of police to pursue investigative leads. The State was permitted to comment on the defense's failure to call the family member to refute claims made in the State's case in chief. Further, the State's commentary did not rise to the level of vouching for its witness. The State was permitted to comment on the testimony of its witness during closing. Appellant's convictions were supported by the weight of the evidence where the evidence was simple and direct; the sole issue was the identity of the shooter. In addition to eyewitness testimony, there was evidence that appellant took steps to obscure
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court· 2014-03-25· cited 2,704×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1985-05-15· cited 1,185×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 1983-02-16· cited 673×
- State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court· 1979-12-19· cited 353×
- State v. D'AmbrosioOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-25· cited 344×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2000-12-27· cited 313×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 286×
- State v. ClemonsOhio Supreme Court· 1998-07-29· cited 234×
- State v. Myers (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-05-17· cited 173×
- Robers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2014-05-05· cited 120×
- State v. VolpeOhio Supreme Court· 1988-08-17· cited 92×
- State v. ChippendaleOhio Supreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 92×
- State v. BiesOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-17· cited 78×
- State v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05· cited 71×
- State v. CarpenterOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-01-14· cited 56×
- State v. Owens (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-09-30· cited 56×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.