Ohio Court of Appeals· 9/24/2021

State v. Staten

Citations

2021 Ohio 3382

Syllabus

Trial court made all required findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences. Sentence affirmed but remanded for nunc pro tunc entry to incorporate findings in judgment entry.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Whitman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-22· cited 22×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-03· cited 4×
State v. Meyer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-05· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Foster
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
State v. Beasley
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
State v. Qualls
Ohio Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 244×
State v. Orzechowski
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 34×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.