Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/18/1983
State v. Nelson
Citations
- 329 N.W.2d 827
- 1983 Minn. LEXIS 1051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Defendant’s apparent willingness to succeed in treatment is not a ground for a downward durational departure . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amdahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TrogSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-08-17· cited 160×
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-07· cited 43×
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-09-22· cited 37×
- State Ex Rel. Ahern v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-02-25· cited 31×
- State v. HagenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-03-26· cited 28×
- State v. HennessySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-01-14· cited 17×
- State v. LovelandSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1976-03-12· cited 6×
- State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-02· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.