State v. Starsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “one may be guilty of disturbing the peace [under a similarly worded statute] if he engages in... violent conduct”
• in upholding disturbing the peace statute, our supreme court stated it was “inconceivable” that the First Amendment protected anyone’s right to “wilfully and maliciously traverse the peace and quiet of his fellow citizens”
• in upholding disturbing the peace statute, our supreme court stated it was “inconceivable” that the First Amendment protected anyone’s right to “wilfully and maliciously traverse the peace and quiet of his fellow citizens”
• due process does not require “specific definitions of each term which would no doubt necessitate further definitions of the definitions, ad infinitum—so that each section of the criminal code would be a thesaurus of definitions, synonyms, and examples”
• due process does not require “specific definitions of each term which would no doubt necessitate further definitions of the definitions, ad infinitum — so that each section of the criminal code would be a thesaurus of definitions, synonyms, and examples”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).