Skip to main content
· 12/11/2003

Beaver v. John Q. Hammons Hotels, L.P.

Citations

  • 138 S.W.3d 664
  • 355 Ark. 359
  • 2003 Ark. LEXIS 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that two issues were “essential” to affirming an administrative decision because “without either, . . . the judgment would not have been able to stand”
  • “While the Restatement (Second) of Judgments has not been adopted per se by this court, we have relied on [the general rule on issue preclusion] in several instances.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Annabelle Clinton Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.