Skip to main content

State v. St. Pierre

Citations

  • 1997 ME 107
  • 693 A.2d 1137
  • 1997 Me. LEXIS 109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the State was not required to prove that the alleged incidents giving rise to an unlawful sexual contact claim occurred on a specific date
  • unanimity instruction was not required regarding purpose for which defendant engaged in sexual conduct
  • unanimity instruction was not required regarding purpose for which defendant engaged in sexual conduct
  • where crime of unlawful sexual contact required that defendant have “purpose” of either arousing or gratifying his sexual desire or of causing bodily injury or offensive physical contact, jury did not have to be unanimous as to which form of “purpose” had been proved

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wathen, Roberts, Glassman, Rudman, Dana, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.