State v. Marden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \opinion testimony that ... is not within the common knowledge of an ordinary person ... may not be given by a lay witness\
• finding that defendant’s post-Miranda “no comment” responses were not unambiguous invocations of the right to remain silent when defendant did not state that he wished for interrogation to end
• allowing fact finder to draw reasonable inferences from circumstantial evidence that victim put in fear without direct evidence of victim’s fear
• \The weight to be given to the evidence and the determination of witness credibility are the exclusive province of the jury.\
• “No judge should preside in a case in which he is not wholly free, disinterested, impartial and independent.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “No judge should preside in a case in which he is not wholly free, disinterested, impartial and independent.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).