State v. Spurr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• informant’s testimony was corroborated by tape recordings and in-person conversations during which the drug sales were arranged and transacted and informant’s credibility was attacked; cautionary instruction not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Huntley
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2022-06-29· cited 11×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1990-11-30· cited 8×
• State v. Tate
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-04-07· cited 6×
• State v. Novotny
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-08-28· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Vito Lorusso and Joseph Errante
  Second Circuit· 1982-12-02· cited 122×
• United States v. Edward D. Patterson, Richard L. Flintoff, Jimmie R. Oglesby, and Gregory C. Martinson
  Ninth Circuit· 1981-06-15· cited 97×
• State v. Smoot
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 92×
• State v. Paradis
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1983-12-19· cited 80×
• State v. Holder
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-05-07· cited 76×
• State v. Stoddard
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1983-10-11· cited 34×
• State v. Curry
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1982-06-29· cited 24×
• United States v. Frank J. Robertson
  Eighth Circuit· 1983-05-11· cited 21×
• Evans v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-02-03· cited 20×
• State v. Nelson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-01-21· cited 9×
• State v. Nelson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1988-06-17· cited 5×