State v. Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that the “reasonable hypothesis” language confused jurors and concluding that the language gave “sharpened clarity” to the meaning of reasonable doubt
• rejecting the argument that the \reasonable hypothesis\ language confused jurors and concluding that the language gave \ sharpened clarity\ to the meaning of reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cherry
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-11-29· cited 144×
• State v. Grippon
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-07-21· cited 45×
• State v. Spurr
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-04-07· cited 5×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Holder
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1979-05-07· cited 76×
• State v. Nelson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-01-21· cited 9×