Skip to main content

State v. Stoddard

Citations

  • 670 P.2d 1318
  • 105 Idaho 533
  • 1983 Ida. App. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • identifying Petitioner’s conviction in the early 1980s as grand larceny of an automobile
  • “For evidence of another crime to be admissible to prove the guilt of the defendant for the crime charged ‘[t]here must be a causal relation or logical and natural connection between the two acts, or they must form parts of but one transaction.’” (Citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swanstrom, Burnett, McFadden, Tern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.