Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/1/2023

State v. Sprague

Citations

230 N.E.3d 549
2023 Ohio 4343

Syllabus

SUMMARY: Trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences is contrary to law where the trial court fails to make all of the required findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) at the sentencing hearing.

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Schaus
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-19· cited 7×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-13· cited 2×
State v. Gill
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-11-25

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Beasley
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
State v. Gwynne
Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-10-25· cited 232×
State v. Gwynne
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-12-23· cited 142×
State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-31· cited 73×
State v. Gideon (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-15· cited 43×
State v. Elmore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 8×
State v. Resendez
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-11· cited 3×
State v. Wadding
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-17· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.