Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/13/2025

State v. Smith

Citations

2025 Ohio 2090

Syllabus

Sulek, J. Trial court's order imposing consecutive sentences is contrary to law because the court failed to make all of the necessary findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4).

Judges: Sulek

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Lewis
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-12-24
State v. McQuin
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-17

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
State v. Beasley
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-01-16· cited 310×
State v. Sipperley
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-25· cited 10×
State v. Elmore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 8×
State v. Kiefer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-03· cited 7×
State v. Schaus
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-19· cited 7×
State v. Hoy
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-23· cited 7×
State v. Neff
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-22· cited 5×
State v. Sprague
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-01· cited 4×
State v. Ratcliffe
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-01· cited 3×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.