Supreme Court of Vermont· 2/21/2003
State v. Sprague
Citations
- 2003 VT 20
- 824 A.2d 539
- 175 Vt. 123
- 2003 Vt. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that an order to exit one’s vehicle is a “further seizure within the meaning of Article Eleven.”
- recognizing that an order to exit one's vehicle is a \further seizure within the meaning of Article Eleven.\
- detention for additional nine minutes to verify that defendant had valid license permissible when defendant failed to produce registration certificate
- detention for additional nine minutes to verify that defendant had valid license permissible when defendant failed to produce registration certificate
- “the great majority of courts take the position that the clearly erroneous standard is appropriate”
- “The government bears a heavy burden of demonstrating that consent given subsequent to an illegal detention was properly obtained.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Amestoy, Dooley, Morse, Johnson, Skoglund
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Commonwealth v. PrattSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-07-20· cited 77×
- State v. BauderSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-03-16· cited 66×
- State v. Therrien, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-11-04· cited 37×
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Vermont· 2003-07-18· cited 36×
- State v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-04-11· cited 35×
- State v. PittsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-05-22· cited 32×
- State v. SoleSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-02-27· cited 31×
- State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-03-19· cited 30×
- State v. McGuiganSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-14· cited 28×
- State v. Shamel L. AlexanderSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-02-12· cited 28×
- State v. StellSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-09-21· cited 25×
- Gregory W. Zullo v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont· 2019-01-04· cited 21×
- Jonathan v. NallySupreme Court of Vermont· 2005-07-22· cited 20×
- State v. Weisler, State v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-16· cited 18×
- State v. GuzmanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2008-08-22· cited 18×
- State v. ErwinSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-04-07· cited 17×
- State of Tennessee v. Wayne DonaldsonTennessee Supreme Court· 2012-08-24· cited 17×
- State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Vermont· 2004-06-10· cited 17×
- State v. FordSupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-09-28· cited 16×
- State v. BurgessSupreme Court of Vermont· 2010-07-02· cited 13×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 1,555×
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
- United States v. DraytonSupreme Court· 2002-06-17· cited 1,084×
- People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-04-18· cited 387×
- United States v. SolisFifth Circuit· 2002-08-06· cited 339×
- State v. MendezWashington Supreme Court· 1999-01-28· cited 310×
- State v. ThurmanUtah Supreme Court· 1993-01-07· cited 251×
- Ferris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-08-18· cited 231×
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisSeventh Circuit· 1997-05-19· cited 206×
- Commonwealth v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-06-14· cited 162×
- State v. PhillipsWisconsin Supreme Court· 1998-05-22· cited 161×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.