Skip to main content
Utah Supreme Court· 8/30/1996

State v. South

Citations

  • 924 P.2d 354
  • 298 Utah Adv. Rep. 4
  • 1996 Utah LEXIS 76
  • 1996 WL 499069

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding case for consideration of alternate ground for affirmance where court had mistakenly refused to consider ground
  • remanding case for consideration of alternate ground for affirmance where court had mistakenly refused to consider ground
  • adopting the ―Langnes doctrine‖ and holding that a cross appeal is necessary only where there exists a challenge to the tangible result of a judgment or decision
  • applying the doctrine enunciated in Langnes v. Green, 282 U.S. 531, 538-39, 51 S.Ct. 243, 75 L.Ed. 520 (1931)
  • applying the doctrine enunciated in Langnes v. Green, 282 U.S. 531, 538-39, 51 S.Ct. 243, 75 L.Ed. 520 (1931)
  • “The State merely offered another line of reasoning which, if accepted, would result in precisely the same outcome as that originally granted by the trial court .... ” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Zimmerman, Howe, Durham, Russon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.