Richardson v. Matador Steak House, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that term “third person” had to be construed more narrowly than plain meaning because statutory context so required
• holding that term \third person\ had to be construed more narrowly than plain meaning because statutory context so required
• refusing to enlarge the classification of persons who could recover under Act beyond its clear language
• refusing to enlarge the classification of persons who could recover under Act beyond its clear language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).