Skip to main content

State v. Duran

Citations

  • 2007 UT 23
  • 156 P.3d 795
  • 573 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 2007 Utah LEXIS 54
  • 2007 WL 703195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The aroma of burning marijuana must be accompanied by some evidence that the suspects are disposing of the evidence, as opposed to casually consuming it,” before the exigency exception applies.
  • “It is ... unlikely that a person in possession of contraband, like marijuana, would be so consumed by paranoia as to dispose of the contraband . . . having no reason to suspect that law enforcement might be alerted to the illegal activities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nehring, Wilkins, Durham, Durrant, Parrish, Nehrings

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.