State v. Hatch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that possession of recently stolen property coupled with a dubious account of its acquisition are sufficient facts to support conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bresolin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-05-05· cited 84×
• State v. Withers
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-12-20· cited 36×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1980-04-28· cited 30×
• State v. Ladely
  Washington Supreme Court· 1973-05-03· cited 27×
• State v. Smyth
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1972-06-07· cited 11×
• State v. Pisauro
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1975-08-20· cited 8×
• State v. Kubicek
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-07-12· cited 8×
• State v. Budinich
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1977-04-11· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Goebel
  Washington Supreme Court· 1950-05-13· cited 183×
• State v. Douglas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-05-25· cited 49×
• State v. Hennings
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-10-26· cited 27×
• Goodner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
  Washington Supreme Court· 1962-12-13· cited 17×
• Lasityr v. City of Olympia
  Washington Supreme Court· 1911-01-20· cited 15×
• State v. Tollett
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-08-17· cited 7×
• State v. Granville
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1970-02-24· cited 2×