State v. Smothers
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5250
Syllabus
MURDER — GROSS ABUSE OF A CORPSE — TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE — MOTION TO SUPPRESS — SEARCH WARRANT — PROBABLE CAUSE — AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION — PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT — POST-ARREST SILENCE — IMPEACHMENT — EVID.R. 403 ¬— SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – MANIFEST WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE — DUE PROCESS — BRADY V. MARYLAND — EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE — POTENTIALLY-USEFUL EVIDENCE — ADVERSE-INFERENCE INSTRUCTION — JUROR MISCONDUCT: The trial court did not err by denying defendant's motion to suppress evidence where the seizure of defendant's car in Grant County, Kentucky, and the subsequent search of the car at the Sharonville Police Department was pursuant to the automobile exception to the warrant requirement and not the alleged defective warrant that police obtained to search the car. The prosecutor's alleged improper comments at trial did not amount to prosecutorial misconduct where the comments were either made to refute defendant's testimony or based on evidence submitted at trial and where defendant failed to show, in light of other evidence of guilt presented at trial, that defendant would not have been found guilty of the charged offenses but for the prosecutor's comments. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting photographs of the decedent's autopsy where each photograph was relevant to illustrate the coroner's testimony about the condition of the decedent's body and the cause of death and the photographs were not repetitive as multiple photographs of the same area of the body showed different injuries to those areas. Defendant's convictions for murder, gross abuse of a corpse, and tampering with evidence were supported by sufficient evidence and not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence where (1) decedent's cell phone and towels soiled with decedent's blood were found in defendant's car, (2) defendant's DNA was under decedent's fingernails and defendant had fresh scratches on his face, (3) shoe prints in the snow near decedent's body matched defe
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court· 1983-05-23· cited 1,999×
- State v. MaurerOhio Supreme Court· 1984-12-20· cited 1,623×
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court· 1991-06-03· cited 1,409×
- Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court· 1999-06-21· cited 695×
- United States v. JohnsSupreme Court· 1985-01-21· cited 515×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- Michigan v. ThomasSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 390×
- Collins v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 2018-05-29· cited 347×
- United States v. Randy GrahamSixth Circuit· 2001-12-17· cited 226×
- State v. KesslerOhio Supreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 219×
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court· 2012-12-06· cited 209×
- State v. KnuffOhio Supreme Court· 2024-03-14· cited 63×
- State v. Kirkland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-08-18· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.