In re C.H.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4955
Syllabus
Delinquent; rape; abduction; R.C. 2907.02(A)(2); R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b); R.C. 2905.02(B); sufficiency; manifest weight; consecutive; commitment; R.C. 2152.17(F); R.C. 2929.14(C); juvenile offender; confinement; discretion. Affirmed the juvenile court's decision adjudicating appellant delinquent of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(2) and 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and of abduction in violation of R.C. 2905.02(B). The decision was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The findings required under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) are not required under R.C. 2152.17(F), which vests the juvenile court with discretion to impose consecutive commitments to the department of youth services. Juvenile offenders are treated differently from adult offenders for purposes of confinement.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. Montgomery (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 291×
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court· 2023-10-24· cited 118×
- In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-06-09· cited 47×
- State v. RoanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-11-05· cited 11×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-18· cited 9×
- In re E.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-24· cited 3×
- State v. SilverOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-07· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.