Ohio Supreme Court· 12/6/1984

State v. Tanner

Citations

15 Ohio St. 3d 1
472 N.E.2d 689
15 Ohio B. 1
54 A.L.R. 4th 139
1984 Ohio LEXIS 1247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Driving is not a right but a privilege well within the purview of a state’s police powers.” (citations omitted)
matter for jury to consider the effect of defendant’s dentures on his BAC test result
“[t]he defendant may still challenge the accuracy of his specific test results, although he may not challenge the general accuracy of the legislatively determined test procedure”
\[T]here is no fundamental constitutional right to drive while drunk....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Celebrezze, Holmes, Locher, Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

82 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.