Ohio Court of Appeals· 2/16/2023

State v. Smith

Citations

2023 Ohio 447

Syllabus

Pro se litigant postconviction-relief petition res judicata. The trial court did not err by denying defendant's postconviction-relief petition the arguments were barred by res judicata because they were reviewed and rejected by this court in the defendant's direct appeal of his convictions and sentence.

Judges: Forbes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Perry
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Gondor
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
State v. Steffen
Ohio Supreme Court· 1994-09-28· cited 454×
State v. Kapper
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 335×
State ex rel. Neil v. French (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-07-11· cited 101×
State ex rel. Gessner v. Vore
Ohio Supreme Court· 2009-08-25· cited 54×
State v. Montgomery
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-26· cited 44×
State ex rel. Kilburn v. Guard
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-05-18· cited 16×
State v. Hale
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-15· cited 13×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-16· cited 2×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.