State v. Smith
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3629
Syllabus
REAGAN TOKES LAW – SENTENCING – RIPENESS – CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY: Constitutional challenges to the Reagan Tokes Law are ripe for review on direct appeal. The Reagan Tokes Law does not violate the separation-of-powers doctrine or substantive- and procedural-due-process rights. Where the provisions of the Reagan Tokes Law do not allow the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction to increase an offender's penalty based upon facts not found by a jury, the law does not violate the right to a trial by jury guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 5 of the Ohio Constitution.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 274×
- State v. Maddox (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-16· cited 99×
- State v. GambleOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-27· cited 32×
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-20· cited 31×
- State v. GuytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-26· cited 28×
- State v. HouseholderOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-06· cited 22×
- State v. ReffittOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-26· cited 14×
- State v. BothuelOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.