State v. Searight
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 3584
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL – SENTENCING – REAGAN TOKES LAW: The trial court erred in failing to deliver the Reagan Tokes Law sentencing notifications required under R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) at defendant's sentencing hearing. The Reagan Tokes Law does not violate the U.S. Constitution or Ohio Constitution on due process, right to trial by jury, or separation of powers grounds. State v. Hacker, Slip Opinion No. 2023-Ohio-2535 State v. Guyton, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-190657, 2022-Ohio-2962, appeal allowed, 168 Ohio St.3d 1418, 2022-Ohio-3752, 196 N.E.3d 850.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- both the Tenth Circuit and the Supreme Court appear to have engaged in de novo review of FDIC decision to deny insurance claim under § 1821(f)
- federal law governs meaning of \deposit\ in federal statute
- federal law governs meaning of \deposit\ in federal statute
- federal law governs meaning of “deposit” in federal statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bergeron
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.