Skip to main content

State v. Reffitt

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3371

Syllabus

CRIMINAL - Sentence contrary to law R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12(C)(4) trial court did not improperly discount substantial mitigating grounds in light of victim's request for leniency Reagan Tokes Law R.C. 2967.271 statutes enjoy presumption of constitutionality Reagan Tokes Law is ripe for review facial challenge vs. as applied challenge appellant's as applied challenge relating to prison rules infractions must be advanced through separate writ when it impacts the duration of confinement separation of powers trial by jury due process procedural safeguards afforded to appellant at a future hearing constitutes an as applied challenge.

Judges: Eklund

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.