Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 7/13/1999
State v. Smith
Citations
- 144 N.H. 1
- 736 A.2d 1236
- 1999 N.H. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- acknowledging that a bank’s failure to “follow its own rules” could provide basis for the claim that the bank “breached an implied covenant of good faith”
- recognizing college’s fiduciary duty to student to prevent sexual harassment by faculty because “[t]he relationship between students and those that teach them is built on a professional relationship of trust and deference, rarely seen outside the academic community”
- one act, not multiple acts, and no genuine possibility of juror confusion as to the culpable act
- potential sentence enhancement based on prior convictions is “punishment for the defendant’s recidivism”
- no genuine possibility of juror confusion as to culpable act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broderick, Horton, Others
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-07-20· cited 66×
- State v. McLellanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-03-14· cited 39×
- State v. SiderisSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-05-16· cited 29×
- State v. HILL, JR.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-10-06· cited 14×
- State v. LeBaronSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-08-19· cited 14×
- Evans v. Taco BellD. New Hampshire· 2005-09-23· cited 8×
- State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2000-12-08· cited 6×
- State v. BluntSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2013-03-13· cited 6×
- Scott, et al. v. First AmericanD. New Hampshire· 2007-01-17· cited 2×
- Douglas v. US Bank Nat’l Assoc.D. New Hampshire· 2013-05-06· cited 2×
- Clearview v. WareD. New Hampshire· 2011-09-09· cited 1×
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2024-10-11
- Moore v. Mortgage Electronic Registration SystemsD. New Hampshire· 2012-01-27
- Chapman v. Anthem, et al.D. New Hampshire· 2005-05-12
- Amherst Country Club v. HarleysvilleD. New Hampshire· 2008-06-24
- Franchi v. New Hampton SchoolD. New Hampshire· 2009-09-18
- L'Esperance v. HSBC Consumer LendingD. New Hampshire· 2012-06-12
- Brodeur v. Claremont School DistrictD. New Hampshire· 2009-06-12
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court· 1885-04-13· cited 382×
- MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-03-29· cited 189×
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerNinth Circuit· 1986-01-21· cited 180×
- United States v. Maria Velarde AnguianoNinth Circuit· 1989-05-05· cited 154×
- United States v. Dwayne A. WashingtonD.C. Circuit· 1997-02-21· cited 108×
- In Re ClaasenSupreme Court· 1891-05-11· cited 97×
- Augustus E. Harvin v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1971-05-07· cited 53×
- State v. GiwoskyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-11-30· cited 40×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-07-05· cited 35×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-10-29· cited 34×
- State v. GerrySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1896-06-05· cited 30×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-12-04· cited 26×
- State v. EricksonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-07-22· cited 22×
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-04-23· cited 20×
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-02-03· cited 16×
- State v. TherrienSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1987-10-09· cited 15×
- Larose v. SuperintendentSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-10-29· cited 13×
- State v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1964-06-02· cited 9×
- State v. CorlissSupreme Court of Vermont· 1987-12-18· cited 9×
- Brown v. BonninSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1989-12-13· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.