State v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[o]ur state law reflects a legislative determination that cocaine is a dangerous drug, particularly when consumed by a young person” and that numerous statutes prohibit its possession, sale, transport and like conduct
• defendant convicted of possession of narcotics
• risk of injury to child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Scruggs
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-09-05· cited 37×
• State v. Heinemann
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-05-08· cited 28×
• State v. Williams
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2007-07-03· cited 23×
• Vanliner Insurance v. Fay
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-10-17· cited 23×
• State v. Bell
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-02-14· cited 19×
• Welsch v. Groat
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-05-30· cited 17×
• State v. Fagan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-18· cited 13×
• State v. Hardy
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-05-09· cited 11×
• State v. Taylor
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-01-11· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Padua
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 162×
• State v. Sanchez
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-02-25· cited 33×
• State v. Willis
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-04-07· cited 20×
• Tetreault v. Eslick
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 18×
• Benson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-13· cited 11×
• People v. Stevenson
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-12-23· cited 9×
• State v. Smith
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-03· cited 5×
• State v. Duncan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-20· cited 4×