People v. Stevenson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statement by defendant that he had swallowed crack cocaine was admissible despite lack of Miranda warnings under the “rescue doctrine”
• finding police could question suspect who admitted swallowing rock cocaine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Panah
  California Supreme Court· 2005-03-14· cited 604×
• People v. Davis
  California Supreme Court· 2009-06-01· cited 350×
• State v. Betances
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-08-26· cited 52×
• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-03-29· cited 15×
• State v. Schinzel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2002-05-09· cited 14×
• Benson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-08-13· cited 11×
• State v. Londo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-11-06· cited 7×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-09-13

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Mincey v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
• New York v. Quarles
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
• People v. Riddle
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-08-04· cited 31×
• People v. Dean
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-06-17· cited 20×
• People v. McDermand
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-11-19· cited 16×
• People v. Willis
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-04-10· cited 12×