Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3099

Syllabus

Nunc pro tunc clerical error jurisdiction postrelease control violation discretion consecutive plea guilty direct appeal res judicata contrary to law. Under the authority of Crim.R. 36, the trial courts properly exercised its continuing jurisdiction to correct a clerical error in its sentencing journal entry with a nunc pro tunc entry to reflect what the court actually decided. The defendant's arguments concerning his sentence and the state's compliance with the negotiated terms of the plea agreement are barred by res judicata.

Judges: E.T. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.