Skip to main content

State v. Evans

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2584

Syllabus

Jurisdiction judgment of conviction sentencing journal entry final, appealable order nunc pro tunc entry. Sentencing journal entry was not a final judgment of conviction and, therefore, was not a final, appealable order where it did not impose sentences on each of the counts of which defendant was convicted. Even if the trial court had jurisdiction, in the absence of a remand by the appellate court, to issue corrected sentencing journal entry while appeal was pending, corrected sentencing journal entry was not a proper nunc pro tunc order because it did not reflect what occurred at the sentencing hearing and was, therefore, invalid. Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Judges: E.A. Gallagher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.