State v. Aarons

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 3671

Syllabus

Jurisdiction judgment of conviction sentencing journal entry final, appealable order blanket sentence separate sentences nunc pro tunc entry. Sentencing journal entry was not a final judgment of conviction and, therefore, was not a final, appealable order where it did not impose separate sentences on each of the counts of which defendant was convicted. Trial court lacked jurisdiction to issue corrected sentencing journal entries while appeal was pending because the corrected entries directly related to and affected matters assigned as error on appeal and were, therefore, inconsistent with the jurisdiction of the appellate court to reverse, modify, or affirm the trial court's judgment. Further, corrected sentencing entries were not proper nunc pro tunc entries because they did not reflect what occurred at the sentencing hearing and were, therefore, void.