Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 103 Wash. 267
  • 174 P. 9
  • 1918 Wash. LEXIS 1045

Syllabus

<p>Criminal Law — Evidence—Intent—Other Crimes. In a prosecution for selling morphine without a physician’s prescription, proof of giving dry morphine on a prescription calling for morphine in solution was sufficient proof of intent to establish criminality; hence it was error to admit evidence of other illegal sales of morphine to other persons for the purpose of establishing intent.</p> <p>Witnesses — Impeachment—Effect of Use of Drugs. In a prosecution for selling morphine without a physician’s prescription, where the prosecuting witness, a sporting woman, was under the influence of morphine at the time of the sale and of her accusation, the defense is entitled to prove by expert testimony the effect of the drug upon her mind and memory.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Trial—Misconduct of Judge — Comment. It is unlawful comment for the court to instruct the jury to view with caution and suspicion the evidence of a witness addicted to the use of morphine.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the defense was entitled to prove, by expert testimony, the effect of the drug upon the mind and memory of its user”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: MacKintosh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.