Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 427

Syllabus

Defendant-appellant's trafficking-in-cocaine, trafficking-in-drugs, and complicity-to-trafficking-in-cocaine convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant-appellant's motion for a mistrial. The trial court did not err in sentencing defendant-appellant because there is not clear and convincing evidence that defendant-appellant's sentence is unsupported by the record or otherwise contrary to law.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.