Skip to main content

State v. Kammeyer

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 3842

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting a video recording of the controlled purchase operation because sufficient evidence was presented to authenticate the recording. Defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Because the trial court failed to make all of the required R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings at the sentencing hearing, defendant-appellant's sentences are contrary to law.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.