Skip to main content

State v. Smith

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 4691

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling Appellant's motions for a new trial. Contrary to Appellant's claim otherwise, the State's failure to disclose an audio-recorded conversation between the victim and the investigating detective did not violate the rule announced in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), because the information on the undisclosed audio recording was cumulative to information already known by the defense prior to trial and/or did not constitute favorable and material evidence that would have affected the outcome of trial. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.