Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/24/2022
State v. Graf
Citations
- 191 N.E.3d 539
- 2022 Ohio 2169
Syllabus
The trial court erred in overruling appellant's Crim.R. 33 new-trial motion. The trial court violated appellant's due-process right to a fair trial by improperly evaluating the credibility of her trial testimony based on its prior out-of-court observations of her behavior. Judgment reversed and remanded for a new trial.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-03-07· cited 7,016×
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 6,060×
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 2,431×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 820×
- State v. SandersOhio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 384×
- State v. DeanOhio Supreme Court· 2010-10-26· cited 115×
- City of Cleveland Heights v. LewisOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 110×
- State v. WestOhio Supreme Court· 2022-05-11· cited 92×
- State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-08-24· cited 80×
- Cleveland v. GoodmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-30· cited 14×
- Buckeye Retirement Co., L.L.C., Ltd. v. BuschOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-05-26· cited 13×
- State v. BentzOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-26· cited 13×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-21· cited 11×
- In re Disqualification of BasingerOhio Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 10×
- In re Disqualification of VercilloOhio Supreme Court· 2013-11-04· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.