State v. Stokes

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 3616

Syllabus

The State adduced sufficient evidence to support appellant's convictions for two counts of aggravated robbery, two counts of robbery, and one count of having a weapon while under disability his convictions also were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The record establishes that the State did not improperly withhold favorable evidence from appellant, and there is no reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense prior to trial, the result of the proceeding would have been different. Finally, given that each of appellant's individual prison sentences was within the authorized statutory range, the total sentence did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Judgments affirmed.