State v. Filholm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
• finding defendant could not establish prejudice from his trial counsel’s failure to include term “rape” within his motion in limine because such action would have been unsuccessful
• alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
• alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
• alleged error must be both specifically assigned and specifically argued in brief of party asserting error to be considered by appellate court
• record on direct appeal insufficient to resolve claim counsel was ineffective in failing to consult and present testimony of DNA expert witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).