Court of Appeals of Oregon· 10/15/2008
State v. Smith
Citations
- 195 P.3d 435
- 223 Or. App. 85
- 2008 Ore. App. LEXIS 1471
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- facts not found to support consecutive sentencing on one count as ordered by trial court, but, on remand, trial court could and would apply consecutive sentencing on other counts to achieve the same result
- declining to exercise Ailes discretion under similar circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Ortega, Carson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. FultsOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 218×
- State v. RamirezOregon Supreme Court· 2007-12-13· cited 157×
- State v. IceOregon Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 113×
- Michael v. CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICESSupreme Court· 2008-03-17· cited 91×
- State v. BowenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-06-11· cited 44×
- State v. ZweigartOregon Supreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 30×
- State v. HagbergOregon Supreme Court· 2008-07-31· cited 13×
- State v. Calderon-OrtizCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 6×
- State v. CrewseCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-09-10· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.