Oregon Supreme Court· 7/31/2008

State v. Hagberg

Citations

190 P.3d 1209
345 Or. 161
2008 Ore. LEXIS 668

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that, in a particular case, it may be possible to determine from a jury’s guilty verdict that the jury necessarily found beyond a reasonable doubt the facts supporting a sentence enhancement; where that is the case, the imposition of enhanced sentences is not error
facts implicit in a jury’s verdicts can support the imposition of consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123
in order for the trial court to impose consecutive sentences under ORS 137.123(2
in a particular case, it may be possible to determine from a jury’s guilty verdict that it necessarily found beyond a reasonable doubt the relevant sentence enhancement facts; in such a case, the imposition of an enhanced sentence is not error
in a particular case, it may be possible to determine from a jury’s guilty verdict that the jury necessarily found beyond a reasonable doubt the facts supporting a sentence enhancement; where that is the case, the imposition of enhanced sentences is not error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.