Supreme Court of Minnesota· 10/18/1991
State v. Smith
Citations
- 476 N.W.2d 511
- 19 A.L.R. 5th 951
- 1991 Minn. LEXIS 264
- 1991 WL 208231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the Sixth Amendment requires reversal per se when counsel was never admitted to the bar
- the Sixth Amendment requires reversal per se when counsel was never admitted to the bar
- counsel's mid-trial suspension for substantive reasons concerning unrelated matters does not result in a per se Sixth Amendment violation
- no Sixth Amendment violation despite the fact that attorney had been suspended for misappropriating client funds, failing to maintain trust account records, neglect of client matters, failing to return client documents promptly, and failing to communicate adequately with clients
- no Sixth Amendment violation despite the fact that attorney had been suspended for misappropriating client funds, failing to maintain trust account records, neglect of client matters, failing to return client documents promptly, and failing to communicate adequately with clients
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Simonett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
- State v. AllegroSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-01-29· cited 165×
- State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-06-21· cited 156×
- Commonwealth v. BretzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-15· cited 94×
- People v PubratMichigan Supreme Court· 1996-06-04· cited 91×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-18· cited 44×
- People v. KennyColorado Court of Appeals· 2001-01-25· cited 33×
- State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2009-04-23· cited 32×
- People v. BrighamIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-09-24· cited 26×
- State v. McCroyNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-06-16· cited 21×
- State v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-05-23· cited 18×
- Cornwell v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-01-11· cited 10×
- United States v. RosnowEighth Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 6×
- Hamilton v. RoehrichD. Minnesota· 2009-04-20· cited 4×
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-07-08· cited 3×
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-07-14· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1992-12-08· cited 1×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-12-11· cited 1×
- People v. AtkinsonNew York Supreme Court· 2004-08-31
- In re Pers. Restraint of LewisWashington Supreme Court· 2023-02-02
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,389×
- Paul Peter Solina, Jr. v. United StatesSecond Circuit· 1983-06-03· cited 188×
- United States v. Barbara Mouzin, United States of America v. Alfonso CarvajalNinth Circuit· 1986-03-18· cited 143×
- Gates v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1987-01-09· cited 133×
- State v. TureSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-06-29· cited 127×
- People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1982-11-18· cited 106×
- United States v. John NovakSecond Circuit· 1990-05-14· cited 105×
- Columbus-McKinnon, Inc. v. Gearench, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-12-11· cited 96×
- John L. Reese v. Howard Peters, Iii, Warden, Pontiac Correctional CenterSeventh Circuit· 1991-02-28· cited 64×
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-05-05· cited 54×
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1990-02-09· cited 49×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-02-24· cited 40×
- Waterhouse v. RodriguezSecond Circuit· 1988-06-03· cited 37×
- Commonwealth v. VanceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-08-01· cited 35×
- Tomas Lopez-Torres v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1989-06-01· cited 33×
- Carvajal v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 30×
- Lopez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-11-27· cited 29×
- People v. LongAppellate Court of Illinois· 1990-12-31· cited 25×
- People v. MedlerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-02-24· cited 23×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.