Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 5/5/1965
Hill v. State
Citations
- 393 S.W.2d 901
- 1965 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1020
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to pay bar dues does not constitute denial of counsel
- no denial of right to counsel where attorney was suspended for failure to pay bar dues at time of representation, but was later reinstated upon payment of fees
- although a delinquent attorney is “prohibited” from practicing law, “[h]e only has to pay his dues *** to resume his status as a ‘practicing lawyer,’ ” and he has not thereby become unlicensed (emphasis omitted)
- attorney's nonpayment of bar dues insufficient to find violation of right to counsel
- Although a delinquent attorney is “prohibited” from practicing law, “[h]e only has to pay his dues *** to resume his status as a ‘practicing lawyer,’ ” and he has not thereby become unlicensed (emphasis omitted)
- failure to pay bar dues
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrison, Woodley, McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. VanderpoolNebraska Supreme Court· 2013-06-21· cited 156×
- United States v. John NovakSecond Circuit· 1990-05-14· cited 105×
- Hudson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-02-05· cited 98×
- Commonwealth v. BretzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-08-15· cited 94×
- United States v. Barry J. HoffmanNinth Circuit· 1984-05-17· cited 67×
- Wayne Kieser v. The People of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1995-06-02· cited 53×
- Cantu v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-09-18· cited 44×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 1979-02-24· cited 40×
- Applebaum v. RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-11-20· cited 34×
- Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Texas Department of Corrections v. Thomas Baker BarfieldFifth Circuit· 1968-03-15· cited 31×
- Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-15· cited 27×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1991-10-18· cited 26×
- People v. BrighamIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-09-24· cited 26×
- Irvin v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals· 1967-10-10· cited 23×
- People v. MedlerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-02-24· cited 23×
- Satterwhite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-23· cited 22×
- State v. GreenNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1994-05-23· cited 18×
- Dolan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-29· cited 12×
- Cornwell v. DoddSupreme Court of Georgia· 1999-01-11· cited 10×
- Scolaro v. State Ex Rel. JonesTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1999-08-05· cited 10×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-11-05· cited 31×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-10-14· cited 30×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-05-06· cited 30×
- Ex Parte LeforsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-06-07· cited 25×
- Chester McKinzie v. O. B. Ellis, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1961-02-23· cited 22×
- Ex Parte GudelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-06-12· cited 19×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-06-18· cited 19×
- Ex Parte CooperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1965-04-14· cited 18×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1960-01-20· cited 18×
- Stokes v. SundermeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1943-04-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.