Washington Supreme Court· 1/7/1977
State v. Smith
Citations
- 559 P.2d 970
- 88 Wash. 2d 127
- 1977 Wash. LEXIS 744
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- search may be incident to lawful arrest, regardless of which comes first, if search and arrest are “reasonably closely related in time and place”
- probable cause to arrest and exigent circumstances justified search as incident to arrest despite the lack of a formal arrest
- defendant in hospital had no reasonable expectation of privacy in his clothing because it was in a semipublic area and hospital had control of the clothes
- probable cause to arrest and exigent circumstances justified search as incident to arrest despite the lack of a formal arrest
- no reasonable expectation in clothes over which hospital personnel had control
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wright, Hunter, Hamilton, Brachtenbach, Dolliver, Rosellini, Utter, Horowitz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 427×
- State v. SimpsonWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 247×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 1984-10-18· cited 240×
- State v. HouserWashington Supreme Court· 1980-12-31· cited 235×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-02· cited 164×
- State v. RingerWashington Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 163×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 1999-11-04· cited 157×
- State v. BinghamWashington Supreme Court· 1986-05-15· cited 82×
- Commonwealth v. SiloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-07-14· cited 77×
- State v. PattersonWashington Supreme Court· 1989-06-15· cited 58×
- State v. TibblesWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-05· cited 54×
- State v. LuomaWashington Supreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 53×
- State v. McKennaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-07-10· cited 46×
- State v. GalloCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1978-07-18· cited 44×
- People v. JordanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-03-04· cited 39×
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1981-02-09· cited 38×
- State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-02-15· cited 28×
- Holt v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-04-18· cited 28×
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-09· cited 28×
- State v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-11-07· cited 26×
Cites
60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1925-11-26· cited 7,454×
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 7,289×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court· 1975-02-18· cited 4,350×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-02-02· cited 3,856×
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1886-02-01· cited 3,820×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court· 1967-06-05· cited 3,591×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court· 1967-05-29· cited 3,217×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- United States v. WatsonSupreme Court· 1975-10-06· cited 2,263×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.