Everts v. Holtmann

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Oregon Securities Law “imposes liability without regard to whether the buyer relies on the omission or misrepresentation”
• only if reasonable minds cannot differ is materiality appropriately resolved as a matter of law
• Oregon securities law “imposes liability without regard to whether the buyer relies on the omission or misrepresentation”
• materiality may be resolved as a matter of law only if reasonable minds could not differ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).