Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/5/2026
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 2113
Syllabus
Duhart. The trial court did not err in imposing two separate five-year firearm specifications because the shootings in this case, which took place months apart, in separate locations, were properly characterized as separate transactions. The trial court did err, however, in failing to impose indefinite prison terms on each of Smith's qualifying felony convictions.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WillsOhio Supreme Court· 1994-07-27· cited 94×
- State v. OrzechowskiOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 34×
- State v. SearlsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-18· cited 13×
- State v. ChambersOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-30· cited 10×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-08· cited 6×
- State v. FlowOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-12-09· cited 5×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-16· cited 1×
- State v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.