State v. Wilson
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 216
Syllabus
Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, find that trial court did not err in denying appellant's request for continuance to hire new counsel or excluding appellant's alibi testimony. The record does not support appellant's claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The state presented sufficient evidence for each of appellant's convictions and they were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court erred when it failed to give appellant an indefinite sentence on his second-degree felony offense.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.