State v. Moore

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 4445

Syllabus

The trial court erred by sentencing appellant to two five-year firearm specifications for offenses that were part of the same act or transaction in violation of R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(c)(iii). Appellant's claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to object to the two five-year firearm specifications is moot based on our determination that appellant must be resentenced due to his sentence being in violation of R.C. 2929.14(B)(1)(c)(iii). Appellant's claim that his convictions were not supported by sufficient evidence and were against the manifest weight of the evidence lacks merit. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for the sole purpose of resentencing appellant to one five-year firearm specification.